- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:838 RSA No. 1940 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1940 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI R.K. BABU S/O LATE ROSAIAH AGEDA BOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO.19, GOKULAM IV STAGE, MANJUNATHPURA MYSURU 570032. …APPELLANT [BY SRI V B SHIVA KUMAR, ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: 1. SRI ANJAIAH S/O LATE VENKATASUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 2. LAXMIDEVI W/O ANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 3. SRI NAGEDNRA S/O DEFENDATS 1 AND 2 AGED 32 YEARS SRI KRISHNA (DEAD) S/O LATE KULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NO 14, GOKULAM IV STAGE (SLUM BOARD HOUSE) MANJUNATHAPURA Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:838 RSA No. 1940 of 2023 MYSURU 570032. 4. SMT REVANAMMA W/O R KONDAIAH (DIED) SRI GOPI S/O R KONDAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 5. SMT. YASHODHA W/O GOPI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.4 & 5 ARE R/AT NO 15, GOKULAM IV STAGE (SLUM BOARD HOUSE) MANJUNATHAPURA MYSURU 570032. 6. SMT REVANAMMA W/O KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS SMT KONDAMMA (DEAD) W/O LATE VENKATASUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.6 R/AT NO 14 GOKULAM IV STAGE (SLUM BOARD HOUSE) MANJUNATHAPURA MYSURU 570032. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 8.09.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.161/2022 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 5.07.2022 PASSED IN OS NO.14/2014 ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MYSURU. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:838 RSA No. 1940 of 2023 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for IV time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 46