HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37275 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Sompal Kashyap, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Ram Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 3. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants Vikram Vibhuti Singh Mourya, Pramod Kumar Maurya, Anil Kumar, Raj Kumar Maurya, Neeraj Maurya, Anuj Maurya, Pradeep Kumar, Narendra Prasad Maurya @ Pappu, Jagdish Kumar and Shripati with the following prayers: "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow this application and quash the charge sheet dated 11.12.2024 as well as cognizance order 02.07.2026 passed Special Judge (S.C./ST Act)/ Additional Sessions Judge, Prayagraj in Special Session Trial No. 918 of 2026 (State Vs. Vikram Vibhuti Singh Maurya and others) arising out of case crime no. 10/2024, police Station Sarai Memrej, District Prayagraj, under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 452, 427, 308, 504, 506 IPC and 3(2) (va), 3(1) (da), 3(1) (dha) of SC/ST Act, pending in the Court of Special Judge (S.C./ST Act)/ Additional Sessions Judge, Prayagraj, during the pendency of the present case before this Hon'ble Court and further be pleased to stay the entire proceeding of Special Session Trial No. 918 of 2026 (State Vs. Vikram Vibhuti Singh Maurya and others) Arising out of case crime no. 10/2024, police Station Sarai Memrej, District Prayagraj pending before the Special Judge (S.C (S.C./ST Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Prayagraj during the pendency of the present case before this Hon'ble Court, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants states that the purpose of the applicants would suffice if an order is passed directing the trial court to decide the bail application of the applicants as expeditiously Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pratibha, Som Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikram Vibhuti Singh Mourya And 9 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) as possible. He further states that although the prayer has been made for quashing and staying the proceedings of the aforesaid case but he does not press the same. 5. Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicants. 6. In view of the above, the prayer for quashing and staying the further proceedings of the aforesaid case is dismissed as not pressed. 7. However, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicants it is directed that if the accused-applicants surrender before the trial court concerned or on before 22.09.2026 and apply for bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 8. The present application stands disposed of. 9. Registrar (Compliance) to communicate this order to the concerned trial court within one week. September 8, 2026 M. ARIF NA528 No. 37275 of 2026 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad