Harini @ Ajay v. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police
/17640/2026 · 2026-07-09
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50215 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50215 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 17640 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 17640 of 2026
1. Harini @ Ajay No. 128 Angappan Naicakan Street Chennai- 600 001
2. R Saysha D/o.Ramesh, No. 11 Ashirvathapuram 12th Lane, Broadway, Chennai- 600 108. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police K-11, Koyembedu Police Station, Chennai - 600 042. Crime no.Not Known of 2026. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, pleased togrant anticipatory Bail to the petitioner in the event of their arrest pending investigation in Crime no. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioners: M/S. J B Solomon Peter Kamaldoss For Respondent(s):
MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 126, 309(4) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. Not known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17640 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners along with another person allegedly abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, attempted to assault him, criminally intimidated him by threatening him with dire consequences. It is further alleged that they robbed a sum of Rs.500/- from the defacto complainant. Hence, a case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that they are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners are transgender persons and they have been arrayed as A1 and A2 among three accused. It is alleged that the petitioners demanded money from the defacto complainant. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17640 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
5. Considering the serious nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. 09-07-2026 JRS To
1. The Inspector of Police K-11, Koyembedu Police Station, Chennai - 600 042. Crime no.Not Known of 2026. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17640 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. JRS CRL OP No. 17640 of 2026 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis