Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50200 (KAR)

SRI N MURALI v. SMT DIVYA R

WP/28072/2025 · 2026-01-29

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5054 WP No. 28072 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 28072 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. N. MURALI S/O NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT BANDAPURA, NEAR GOWRAMMA TEMPLE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL - 560 099. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGENDRA H.C, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SMT. DIVYA R W/O N. MURALI, D/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, NO. 50, JAYANAGAR, 7TH BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 070. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ALLOW THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION AND STAY THAT PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE IST ADDL. PRL. FAMILY JUDGE AT BENGALURU IN M.C.NO.4211/2022 AND ETC., Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5054 WP No. 28072 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER No representation on petitioner's side on call. The writ petition was filed in the month of September 2025 and till now office objections are not complied. Thus it is clear that despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner did not choose to comply the office objections. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7