M/S. SSG Enterprises v. The Commercial Tax Officer
WP/25441/2026 · 2026-07-14
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50197 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50197 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 25441 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 25441 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.27732 & 27731 of 2026 M/S. SSG Enterprises Rep by its Proprietor Thiru Dhanasekar S.F. No.73-3B, Sivanandha Nagar, Dharapuram Road, K. Chettipalayam, Tiruppur, TamilNadu-641 608 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Commercial Tax Officer Tiruppur, Tamilnadu. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in Impugned DRC-07 dated 23.06.2025 bearing Reference No.ZD330625239671C on the file of the Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondent to provide the Petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing and pass fresh orders on merits in accordance with law. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Prince Simon For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ********** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25441 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 23.06.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25441 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 14-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Commercial Tax Officer Tiruppur, Tamilnadu.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25441 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 25441 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.27732 & 27731 of 2026 14-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis