- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:75 WP No. 25958 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 25958 OF 2022 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. SHIVA KUMAR S. TANDUR S/O SHARANA BASAPPA K. TANDUR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO. 24/64A, VIGNESHWARA NILAYA, VALMIKI NAGAR (BEHIND OLD POLICE STATION) MASKI, LINGASAGUR TALUK RAICHUR DISTRICT - 584 124. R/AT HOUSE NO. 42, 4TH CROSS CAMBRIDGE GARDEN LAYOUT, NEXT TO ALPHA GARDEN, OPP SAIL NILAYAM, AYYAPPA ANGAR, K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 036. OFFICE ADDRESS SHIVA KUAMR S. TANDUR WORLD INFORMATICS, EPIP ZPONE 38-40, IONIDIA, NEAR TO GENESIS AND OPPOSITE GE, HEALTH CARE WHITEFILED, BENGALURU - 560 066. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHRIDHAR NARAYAN HEGDE, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:75 WP No. 25958 of 2022 AND: 1. SMT. ASHWINI K.P. W/O SHIVA KUMAR S. TANDUR AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 2. AYUSH S. TANDUR S/O SHIVA KUMAR S. TANDUR AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS (MINOR), REPRESENTED BY 1ST PETITIONER NEXT FRIEND NATURAL GUARDIAN HIS MOTHER BOTH ARE R/A GAJARAJA KRUPA NILAYA 1ST CROSS, NEW EXTENSION KOLAR - 563 122. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.O. CHANDRA SHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23.11.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. FAMILY COURT JUDGE, KOLAR IN PARTLY ALLOWING I.A.NO. III IN DIRECTING THE PETITIONER HEREIN TO PAY THE INTERIM MAINTENANCE OF RS. 75,000/- PER MONTH TO THE RESPONDENTS IN M.C.NO. 93/2020, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A TO THE WP AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:75 WP No. 25958 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Sri. Shridhar Narayan Hegde, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the matter is settled amicably between the parties and therefore the writ petitioner intend to withdraw the writ petition. Seeks permission for withdrawal. Memo to that effect is also filed. 2. Permission as prayed for is accorded. Writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 90