IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 961 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1500 OF 2026 MANGALA MOHAN DHINDALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sisodiya Ashutosh C. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. V. K. Kotecha. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Gandhe Yogeshwar V. … CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : August 25, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. The present application for regular bail wherein the offences are under Sections 64, 115 of B.N.S. and Sections 4, 8 and 12 of POCSO. After hearing the learned advocate for the applicant for some time and after perusing the case papers this Court has shown disinclination to allow the application. The learned advocate, on instructions, submits that he does not want to press the application on merits. However, he prays for directions to the Trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously. Liberty is granted as prayed. 2. Bail Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. The learned Trial Court is requested to conclude the trial expeditiously. ( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) ... vmk/- 2026:BHC-AUG:38732