Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3958 RSA No. 1986 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1986 OF 2023 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
1.
2.
G. NAGESH SHEREGAR SINCE DEAD BY LRS
SMT SAROJA N SHERUGAR W/O LATE G NAGESH SHERUGAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
3.
KUM VINAYA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
4.
VIDYA SHERUGAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
5.
SRI GANESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
6. VEENA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
7.
KARTHIK PRASAD AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
APPELLANTS NO.2 TO 6 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE G. NAGESH SHEREGAR, R/A SANTHAYYANAKERI, NEAR RAM MANDIR, GANGOLLI VILLAGE AND POST 576 216, KUNDAPURA TALUK. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3958 RSA No. 1986 of 2023
AND:
1.
SUBRAHMANYA SAKLATHI AGED 48 YEARS,
2.
SRIDHAR SAKLATHI AGED 52 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 Are CHILDREN OF NARAYANA DRIVER
3.
NARAYANA DRIVER AGED 60 YEARS, PARENTS NOT KNOWN
4.
APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR SINCE DEAD,
SMT SANJEEVI SHEREGAR AGED 70 YEARS, W/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR,
5.
SUBRAHMANYA SHEREGAR AGED 38 YEARS, S/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR
6.
SANTHOSH SHEREGAR AGED 35 YEARS, S/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR
7.
SMT PREMA SHEREGAR AGED 34 YEARS, D/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR
8.
SMT BABAY SHEREGAR AGED 32 YEARS, D/O LATE APPAYYANA HANUMANTHA SHEREGAR R/A NERAMBALLI KONI VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DIST.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3958 RSA No. 1986 of 2023
9.
SMT. RESHMA @ SHASHIKALA AGED 39 YEARS, W/O LATE GANGADHARA
10. RAGHAVENDRA SHEREGAR AGED 30 YEARS, S/O LATE GANGADHARA
11. GIRISH SHEREGAR AGED 19 YEARS, S/O LATE GANGADHARA
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 8, 10 TO 12 ARE R/A SANTHAYYANAKERI, NEAR RAMA MANDIR, GANGOLLI VILLAGE AND POST - 576 216 KUNDAPURA.
12. SHEKHAR POOJARY S/O NARAYANA POOJARY R/O SATHNAKERI, NEAR RAMA MANDIR, GANGOLLI VILLAGE AND POST 576216 KUNDAPURA TALUK. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.06.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.4/2022 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.11.2021 PASSED IN OS NO.260/2023 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3958 RSA No. 1986 of 2023
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16