Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50171 (KAR)

MRS LEELA v. MR BABU POOJARY

RSA/1427/2024 · 2026-01-27

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4456 RSA No. 1427 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1427 OF 2024 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. LEELA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS W/O LATE CHINGA REP. BY GPA HOLDER 2. MR. SHEENA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O LEELA 3. MR. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O LEELA 4. MR. SURESHA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O LEELA 5. MR. RAGHU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS SON IN LAW OF LEELA ALL ARE R/AT MOODUKONAJE VILLAGE PADUKONAJE POST MOODABIDRI TALUK D.K. - 574 227 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4456 RSA No. 1427 of 2024 AND: MR. BABU POOJARY AGED ABOUT 67 YEAS S/O LATE DEJAPAP POOJARY KELAGINA MANE MOODUKONAJE VILLAGE PADUKONAJE POST MOODABIDRE TALUK D.K. - 574 227 …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.02.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.167/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MOODBIDRI, D.K., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.08.2023 PASSED IN OS NO.163/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MOODBIDRI, AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4456 RSA No. 1427 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 52