[2026:RJ-JP:15036] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 35/2026 Chetan Patni S/o Subhash Patni, R/o 402 The Palm Mahavir Nagar Durgapura Jaipur. ---Complainant-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Petitioner 2. Neha Bumb W/o Shri Mohit Kumar Bumb, R/o 104, S.B.C. Apartment Lalarpura Road, Gandhi Path West Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur At Present Residing At Flat No. 217 Silver Crown Opposite S.B.C. Apartment Lalarpura Road Gandhi Path West Vaishali Nagar Jaipur. 3. Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Tara Chand Jain, R/o 104, S.B.C. Apartment Lalarpura Road, Gandhi Path West Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur At Present Residing At Flat No. 217 Silver Crown Opposite S.B.C. Apartment Lalarpura Road Gandhi Path West Vaishali Nagar Jaipur. ----Accused-Non-petitioners For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sharvan Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Ashok Sharma Mr. M.S. Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/04/2026 1. The instant bail cancellation application has been filed under Section 483(3) of the BNSS in connection with FIR No. 363/2024 registered at Police Station Bassi District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B of IPC. 2. On 06.11.2025, the non-applicant(s) was given benefit of grant of bail, taking note of the consensus drawn in-between the [2026:RJ-JP:15036] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-35/2026] respective sides vis-a-vis the arrears, that was assured to be paid within a period of successive three months. 3. It is submitted that present bail cancellation application is moved as the non-applicants have disobeyed the orders of Court and have breached the conditions, therefore, bail should be canceled. 4. Learned counsel for the non-applicants has fairly conceded the fact that the non-applicants have not paid the arrears, because of undue hardship being faced by them. Learned counsel for the non-applicants has pleaded for grant of extension of time, however, learned counsel for the applicant has denied the same stating that the bail grant order was passed, in consonance with the consent as rendered thereby. 5. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that non-applicants have disobeyed the orders of Court, failed to submit the arrears, and have breached the conditions, and in light of the guidelines spelled out in the ratio encapsulated in Himanshu Sharma v. State of Madhya Pradesh: 2024 INSC 139, this Court is inclined to allow the bail cancellation application. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail cancellation application filed under Section 483(3) of the BNSS is allowed. 7. A copy of the present order be sent to concerned District Judge, by fax/mail, who shall further send a copy to the Officer In- charge concerned, for doing the needful. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /s-210