Velkumar v. State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/17706/2026 · 2026-07-09
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50152 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50152 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 17706 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 17706 of 2026 Velkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, B2, Tiruvallur Taluk Police Station, Thiruvallur District. Cr.No.97 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, pleased to enlarge on bail in crime No.97 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Suriyamuthu N For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal Side ) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.04.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 64 (2) (m) of BNS, 5 (l), 5 (j) (ii) r/w 6 (1) of POCSO Act, 2012, in Crime No.97 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner committed forcible penetrative sexual assault against the seventeen year old victim. Hence, the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17706 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been in custody since 05.04.2026. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and produced the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, which contains serious allegations of sexual assault. He further submitted that the petitioner is approximately thirty-nine years old and the victim is approximately seventeen years old. He further contended that the victim was pregnant. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 5.In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) and a perusal of the statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, which clearly demonstrates serious allegations of forcible penetrative sexual assault against the petitioner. Accordingly, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner has no merit and is not entitled for bail. Consequently, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09-07-2026 ep https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17706 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1.The Inspector of Police, B2, Tiruvallur Taluk Police Station, Thiruvallur District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 17706 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. EP CRL OP No. 17706 of 2026 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis