WP No. 2669 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 2669 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.2906 of 2026 K.Chandran ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 2. The Disrict Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri Revenue Division, Dharmapuri. 4. The Tahsildar, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri. 5. The Inspector of police, Krishnapuram police station, Dharmapuri District. 6. Manickam 7. Balamurugan 8. Sekar 9. Velliangiri 10.Sujatha 11.Balaji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2669 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 12.Sathiya 13.Durai 14.G.V.Prakasam 15.Saravanan 16.Raji 17.Chandrasekar 18.Murugan 19.Ganesan 20.Mohanasundaram ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 4th respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner based on the application made by the petitioner dated 07.01.2026 vide online application No.2026/0105/05/000497 in respect of the property comprised in survey Nos.300, 301, 302 and 303 and its sub divisions, situate at Krishnapuram village, Dharmapuri Taluk and district. For Petitioner(s): M/s.S.Angamuthu J.Sathiya D.Ezhilarasan For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel for R1 to 4 Mr.Durai Gunasekaran, Government’s Counsel for R5 Mr.Vishnu Manoharan for R7 to 18 Mr.S.Janarthanan for R19 & 20 R6- notice served- no appearance https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2669 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 07.01.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made an online application dated 07.01.2026 to issue patta on his favour in respect of the property comprised in survey Nos.300, 301, 302 and 303 and its sub divisions, situate at Krishnapuram village, Dharmapuri Taluk and district. However, the same was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Learned Government's Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 would submit that the petitioner's application has already been considered and an order was passed on 19.05.2026. Hence, no further order is required in this writ petition. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Since the fourth respondent has passed an order on the petitioner's application, the appropriate remedy available to the petitioner is to challenge the said order dated 19.05.2026 in accordance with the law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2669 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous with a liberty to challenge the order dated 19.05.2026. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 09-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 2. The Disrict Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 3. The Reveneu Divisional Officer, Dharmapuri Revenue Division, Dharmapuri. 4. The Tahsildar, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri. 5. The Inspector of police, Krishnapuram police station, Dharmapuri District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2669 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 2669 of 2026 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis