- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21439 WP No. 21661 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21661 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI JAI GANESH @ JAY GANESH S/O LATE K.SUBRAMANI, SINCE IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY, THROUGH HIS WIFE, SMT. PUSHPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.75, 2ND CROSS, MUNESHWARA BLOCK, PALACE GUTTAHALLI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU – 560 003. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.19/1, 14TH CROSS, SWIMMING POOL EXTENSION, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MADESH M.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VYALIKAVAL POLICE STATION, BENGALURU – 560 003. REPRESENTED BY ITS Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21439 WP No. 21661 of 2025 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SRI PRADEEP KUMAR, S/O SAMPATH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT. NO.29. 1ST MAIN, PREETHI NAGAR, LAGGERE, BENGALURU – 560 086. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP FOR R-1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF THE BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO I. ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31.01.2025 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, FTSC-IV, BENGALURU IN CRIME NO.0003/2025 FOR REMANDING THE PETITIONER TO POLICE CUSTODY (ANNEXURE-AA) IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE; II. DECLARE THAT THE ARREST OF PETITIONER ON 30.01.2025 AS ILLEGAL IN VIEW OF NON-SERVICE OF THE GROUNDS OF ARREST TO THE PETITIONER OR HIS FAMILY MEMBERS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has moved a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21439 WP No. 21661 of 2025 2. The memo reads as follows: “The Petitioner has challenged the order dated 31.01.2025 for remanding the Petitioner for judicial custody and also not providing grounds of arrest. The wife of the Petitioner has instructed to the undersigned advocate to withdraw the above petition. Hence, there is urgency in the above matter.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 169