- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3171 RSA No. 1748 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1748 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI. J.C. PUTTASWAMY S/O LATE CHANNABASAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT JANNUR VILLAGE - 571 115 SANTHEMARANAHALLI HOBLI CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. JAI PRAKASH REDDY M, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: BASAVANNA @ BASAPPA DEAD BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1. SRI. M. JAYAMMA W/O LATE BASAVANNA @ BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 2. SRI MAHADEVASWAMY S/O LATE BASAVANNA @ BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 3. VANI D/O LATE BASAVANNA @ BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE R/O NO.1207, VANI VILAS ROAD, K R MOHALLA, MYSURU - 570 024. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3171 RSA No. 1748 of 2022 4. SIDDESH S/O LATE BASAVANNA @ BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT JANNUR VILLAGE - 571 115 SANTHEMARANAHALLI HOBLI CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT. 5. SIDDALINGAPPA S/O LATE ANKAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 6. SIDDAPPA S/O LATE ANKAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 7. PUTTABHUDDI S/O LATE ANKAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 8. ANKAPPA @ SOMANNA S/O LATE ANKAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 5 TO 8 ARE R/AT JANNUR VILLAGE - 571 115 SANTHEMARANAHALLI HOBLI CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT. 9. SIDDAPPA S/O LATE MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT JANNUR VILLAGE - 571 115 SANTHEMARANAHALLI HOBLI CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.08.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.71/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JDUGE AND CJM, CHAMARAJANAGARA. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3171 RSA No. 1748 of 2022 DECREE DATED 31.08.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.40/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, YELANDUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT When matter was listed on 05.01.2026 for non- compliance of office objections for V time, at request of learned counsel for appellant further time was granted on cost. 2. Neither cost is paid nor office objections are complied by appellant. This would indicate that appellant is not diligent in pursuing appeal. Therefore, Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution imposing further cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to Chief Minister's Relief Fund. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2