MR ROLWIN PETER RODRIGUES v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER
WP/23468/2023 · 2026-01-20
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50116 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 50116 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3292 WP No. 23468 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 23468 OF 2023 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR ROLWIN PETER RODRIGUES AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF M/S POMPEI SQUARE SUPERMARKET, POMPERI SQUARE MAIN ROAD, GURUPURA KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE - 574 151
ALSO AT DOOR NO. 6-155 SALMARA, MULURU VILLAGE, KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE - 574 151
2.
MRS. ANITHA RODRIGUES W/O MR ROLWIN RODRIGUES AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, DOOR NO. 6-155,
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3292 WP No. 23468 of 2023
SALMARA, MULURU VILLAGE KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE - 574 151. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KARUNAKARA P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER BHARAT CO-OPERATIVE BANK (MUMBAI) LTD., VASUKI TOWER, NEXT TO VISHWAS COMMERCIAL BUILDING, NEAR TALUK OFFICE OPP: DISTRICT COURT UDUPI - 576 101 REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER SRI BALAKRISHNA S KARKERA …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. GIRISH D V., A.K. VASANTH, ADVOCATES FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SALE NOTICE DTD 06.09.2023 APPOINTING COURT COMMISSIONER TO TAKE POSSESSION BY BREAKING OPEN THE LOCK IN THE AID OF JURISDICTIONAL POLICE PRODUCED AT ANNX-A.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3292 WP No. 23468 of 2023
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo stating that the loan account of the petitioner has been regularized. In view of the same, nothing survives for
consideration and the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
4. In view of the disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory application/s do not survive for consideration and they are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS CT:KHV