. Narender Kumar Vs. Sh. D.D. Modgil. Cr.M.P. No. 400 of 2026. 30.01.2026 Present: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.2. At the oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, State of Himachal Pradesh is impleaded as respondent No.2 in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to supply the copy of the petition to the learned Additional Advocate General during the course of the day. Cr.M.P No. 400 of 2026 By way of this application, applicant has prayed for preponment of the application for condonation of delay in filing the revision petition. In view of the averments made in the application and the fact that the applicant/petitioner has been arrested by the Police on 27.01.2026, the application is allowed and the application for condonation of delay along-with revision petition is taken on board. Application is accordingly disposed of. Cr.M.P.M No. 2692 of 2025 Notice. Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Issue notice to respondent No.1, returnable for 03.02.2026, on taking steps within two days. Dasti notice is permitted. List on 03.02.2026. Reply to the application be filed by respondent No.2, in the meantime. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) Vacation Judge January 30, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)