- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6473 RSA No. 1802 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1802 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. BASAVARAJU S/O LATE LAKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS AGRICULTURIST 2. SURESHA S/O LATE LAKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS AGRICULTURIST 3. RAVI S/O LATE LAKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS AGRICULTURIST ALL ARE R/A HALIYUR VILLAGE HARANAHALLI HOBLI, CHAPPARADAHALLI POST, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 102. 4. SMT. RUKMINI D/O LATE LAKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O GORAGUNDI VILLAGE KAGGERE POST, K R NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SUNIL S NARAYAN, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6473 RSA No. 1802 of 2022 1. 1(a) SRI LAKKAIAH SINCE DEAD BY LRS (NOTE - DIED DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE SUIT) SMT KAMAKSHAMMA W/O LATE LAKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS AGRICULTURIST 2. SRI SHIVANNA S/O LATE LAKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS AGRICULTURIST RESPONDENT NOs.1 & 2 ARE R/A HALIYUR VILLAGE, HARANAHALLI HOBLI, CHAPPARADAHALLI POST, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 102. 3. C M KALEGOWDA S/O LATE MARIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS AGRICULTURIST RESIDING AT CHAPPARADAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST HARANAHALLI HOBLI PERIYAPATNA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 102. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.08.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.14/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIRO ICVI JUDGE, PERIYAPATNA. ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.02.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.83/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPTNA. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6473 RSA No. 1802 of 2022 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Though, case was passed over and called again, there is no representation. Despite sufficient opportunities, office objections have not been complied, even cost ordered was not paid. This would indicate that appellants are not diligent in pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE Psg* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8