Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 904 CONT. PETITION NO. 200 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CONT. PETITION NO. 200 OF 2026 IN WP/8066/2009 RAHUL S/O VIKRAM BAGAL VERSUS MR. ASEEMKUMAR GUPTA ….. Adv. S. A. Wakure, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondents-State Adv. A. N. Barhate Patil h/f Adv. V. B. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No. 5 …..
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 27/08/2026
Per Court: . The learned counsel for the petitioner placed on record the Government Resolution dated 28.07.2026 along with the order of the same date in respect of the reservation of the disputed land. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The
learned counsel for the petitioner, thus, submitted that the order under contempt is complied with.
2. In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:38938-DB