Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50079 (KAR)

B M R SHAMEER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/12467/2025 · 2026-01-27

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4156 CRL.P No. 12467 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12467 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. B M R SHAMEER S/O MOHAMMAD RAFIK AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, NO 9,1ST MAIN 4TH CROSS, NEAR SADIQ MASJID, BROTHERS COLONY, CHIKKABANAVARA BENGALURU -560 090 2. MOHAMMAD RAFIQ S/O LATE NASIRUDDIN SAB AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 3. B. GULAB JAN W/O MOHAMMAD RAFIK AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 4. B. SUMIYA D/O MOHAMMAD RAFIK AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 5. B. ARSHIYA C/O CHITRA SADE BABJAN AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS NO.12-02-403 ASHOKNAGAR ANANTAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH - 515 001 SL.NO.2 TO 4 ARE R/A KOTTA MASIDU COLONY Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4156 CRL.P No. 12467 of 2025 AMARAPURAM, ANANTAPUR ANDRAPRADESH-515 281 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SYED KHALEEL PASHA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY SIRA TOWN POLICE TUMKUR. 572 101 REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 2. GHOUSIA RUHEENA PARVEEN, D/O MOHAMAD NIZAMUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, ASSAR MOHALLA SHA ALI NAGAR SIRA, TUMKUR - 572 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.327/2025 REGISTERED AT SIRA P.S., PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND CJM, SIRA, TUMKUR, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 115(2),351(2),352,85 R/W 3(5) OF BNS, 2023, U/S 3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT, 1961. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4156 CRL.P No. 12467 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that during the pendency of the petition, the Police after investigation have filed the final report-charge sheet. 2. In the light of filing of the charge sheet, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and raise a challenge to the charge sheet. 3. Liberty so sought is granted. 4. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18