Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5007 (GAU)

JATESWAR BARMAN v. KRIPAL NATH

I.A.(Crl.)/88/2026 · 2026-02-08

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010021392026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/88/2026 JATESWAR BARMAN S/O DIGEN BARMAN, R/O VILL. DWARKA, P.O. DWARKA, P.S. LAKHIPUR, DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM. VERSUS KRIPAL NATH S/O PRATUL CH. NATH, R/O VILL. FATEHPUR, P.O. AND P.S. AGIA, DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN 783120 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M M ZAMAN, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 09.02.2026 Heard Mr. M M Zaman, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 13 days in preferring the connected appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. Going for issuing notice to the respondent would not serve any purpose other than delaying the whole matter. The delay stands condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed accordingly. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant