- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2635 WP No. 26165 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 26165 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI Y N SURESH S/O NARASARAMAREDDY, AGED 33 YEARS 2. SRI KRISHNAREDDY S/O Y.N. NARASAPPA AGED 53 YEARS 3. SMT. RAMALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANASWAMY AGED 48 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT: YENDAGUTTAPALLI VILLAGE RAYALPAD HOBLI, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 135. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAKASH M.H, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI P N JAYARAM S/O LATE P.N.NARASAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS 2. SRI Y.J.SRINIVAS S/O P.N.JAYARAM AGED 31 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT YENDAGUTTAPALLIL VILLAGE RAYALPAD GOBLIL SRINIVASAPURA TALUK Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2635 WP No. 26165 of 2025 KOLAR DISTRICT-563 135 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAGADEESH C.K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.06.2025 PASSED IN THE M.A.NO.31/2024 BY THE II ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KOLAR, VIDE ANNX-M AND CONSEQUENTLY RESTORE THE ORDER DTD 18.07.2024 PASSED BY THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SRINIVASPURA IN O.S.NO.401/2023 VIDE ANNX-K. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 1. This petition by the defendants in O.S.No.401/2023 is directed against the impugned order dated 27.06.2025 passed in M.A.No.31/2024, whereby the said appeal filed by the respondents - plaintiffs against the order dated 18.07.2024 passed in O.S.No.401/2023 dismissing the application filed by them for temporary injunction was allowed by the First Appellate Court, which consequently, allowed the application filed by the respondents-plaintiffs. 2. Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims, having regard to the material - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2635 WP No. 26165 of 2025 on record, which clearly indicates that the issue and controversy between the parties would necessarily have to be decided by the Trial Court only after a full fledged trial by permitting both the parties to adduce oral and documentary evidence in respect of their respective claim, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the rival contentions, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this petition by modifying the impugned order dated 27.06.2025 passed by the First Appellate Court by directing both the parties to maintain status-quo in all respects as on today in relation to the suit schedule property till the disposal of the suit on merits by the Trial Court. 3. The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, without being influenced by the findings and observations recorded in the order of the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court. 4. All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter are kept/left open to be decided by the Trial Court and no opinion is expressed on the merits/demerits of the rival contentions. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2635 WP No. 26165 of 2025 Subject to the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. SD/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE PKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21