SAHADEB CHAKMA @ MASTER v. THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
I.A.(Crl.)/187/2026 · 2026-02-24
Kaushik Goswami, Michael Zothankhuma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5004 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5004 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010035932026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/187/2026 SAHADEB CHAKMA @ MASTER SON OF BRIJMOHAN CHAKMA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- GIZACHERRA, P.S- LONGTHARAI VALLEY, DISTRICT- DHALAI, TRIPURA 799275. VERSUS THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION REPRESENTED BY THE STANDING COUNSEL, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A ATREYA, MR. J KONWAR,MS. C KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, CBI,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 25.02.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J)
Mr. D.K. Bhattacharyya and Mr. J. Konwar, learned counsels for the applicant pray for condoning the delay of 3436 days in preferring the appeal against the conviction
and
sentence
of
the
appellant
under
Section
Page No.# 2/2 120B/364A/395/397/201/34 IPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Kamrup(M), Assam, in Sessions Case No.227(K)/2006.
2. The applicant’s counsels submit that altogether 9 (nine) persons have been convicted by the impugned judgment and 4 (four) appeals have been filed against the said judgment. While all the appeals have been disposed of, two of the convicted persons have been acquitted of the charges framed against them.
3. On considering the reasons for the delay given by the applicant in paragraph-9 of the application, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay of 3436 days is condoned.
4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same.
5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant