Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5003 (JHR)

KUNAL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2735/2026 · 2026-04-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:9664 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2735 of 2026 ------ Kunal Kumar, aged about 25 years, S/o Brajkishore Yadav, resident of Village-Chakme, P.O.-Chakme, P.S.-Burmu, District-Ranchi. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kr. Ganjhu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 06-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.313 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 109, 61(2) & 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused person committed murder of Ravi Kumar by promising to pay money to the co-accused person. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that except suspicion, there is no other material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case and there is no allegation against the petitioner of either being present in the place of occurrence or doing any overt act. It is next submitted that the co-accused has been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 23.03.2026 in B.A. No.12087 of 2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.09.2025 as mentioned in para-21 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No.313 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 06/04/2026 Abhiraj/