Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50025 (MAD)

Jayanthi v. R.Dhanalakshmi

CMP/14289/2026 · 2026-07-13

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No.14289 of 2026 in CMA SR No.77696 of 2026 N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J Notice to the 1st respondent is dispensed with, since he remained ex-parte before the Tribunal. Notice has been served on the 2nd respondent and the name of the 2nd respondent is also printed in the cause list. There is no appearance either in person or through counsel. 2.This Civil Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 155 days in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the records. 4.Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 155 days is condoned. 5.Registry is directed to number the main Civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. 6.It is made clear that for the period of delay of 115 days, the petitioners will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. 13.07.2026 ssr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis