Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50016 (MAD)

M/S.Raj Pipe Industries, Represented by its Proprietor Arockiaraj v. The Commercial Tax Officer

WP/25474/2026 · 2026-07-15

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 25474 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 25474 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.27770 & 27771 of 2026 M/S.Raj Pipe Industries, Represented by its Proprietor Arockiaraj 16, Secretariat colony, adambakkam main road, adambakkam, chennai, Tamilnadu - 600088. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Commercial Tax Officer Nanganallur south III, Chennai south, tamilnadu. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dated 31.08.2024, bearing reference No. ZD3308243095593 on the file of the respondent and quash the same, and consequently direct the respondent to condone the delay in filing the statutory appeal. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Prince Simon For Respondent(s): Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) ********** https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25474 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 31.08.2024 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 50% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 50% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 50% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25474 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Commercial Tax Officer nanganallur south III, Chennai south, tamilnadu. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25474 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 25474 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.27770 & 27771 of 2026 15-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis