Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 50013 (CAL)

PRABHAS MONDAL v. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORG. AND ORS.

WPA/20696/2024 · 2026-10-07

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1 07.10.2026 Item No.25 Court No. 30 Aloke WPA 20696 of 2024 Prabhas Mondal -vs- Employees’ Provident Fund Organization & Ors. Ms. Aparna Banerjee … for the respondent no. 1/ RPFC Ms. Amrita Pandey Mr. Ghanshyam Pandey … for the Delta Ltd. 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. On hearing the learned counsels for the parties and on considering the submissions made by Ms. Banerjee appearing for the P.F. Authority wherein she submits that the petitioner has already receiving pension. 3. It is further submitted that the provident fund amount has also been allotted in favour of the petitioner/claimant on prorata basis but the same could not be handed over to the petitioner as no online claim application has been submitted by the petitioner. 4. Petitioner is thus at liberty to submit the online claim application and receive the amount from the P.F. Authorities. 5. It is submitted by the respondent authorities that as the provident fund amount has been paid 2 2 by the private respondent when it was due, and no specific calculation of interest has been provided by the petitioner, the petitioner’s claim is to be treated as fully settled. 6. In view of the said fact and circumstances, the writ application is disposed of. 7. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)