Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20601 WP No. 7264 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 7264 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE GANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT KODAGI THIRUMALAPURA, HESARUGATTA HOBLI, YALAHANKA TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 089. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAVEENA KUMARA NIRVANI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR YALAHANKA TALUK OFFICE, (OLD) BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20601 WP No. 7264 of 2024
BANGALORE - 560 064.
4.
SRI. ANJANAPPA S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
5.
SRI. VENKATAPPA S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT KODAGITHIRUMALAPURA VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YALAHANKA TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 089.
6.
SRI.H. VISHWANATH S/O HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT KODAGITHIRUMALAPURA VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YALAHANKA TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 089. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 266 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
ORDER DTD 31.10.2023 ANNEXURE-S, AND ORDER DTD 07.01.2022 ANNEXURE-P AND
ORDER DTD 08.12.2021 ANNEXURE-N AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20601 WP No. 7264 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
On 08.04.2026, the following order was passed:
"Finally, a week's time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections. Failing which, list this matter on 16.04.2026 for dismissal."
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Office objections have not been complied with.
4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6