CRL OP No. 17083 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 17083 of 2026 Williams S/o. Shanmugaiya, Flat No.2, Rameshwara apartment, 1 Rajammbal Street, Thiyagaraya Nagar, Chennai 600017 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police T5, Vanagaram Police Station, Cr.No.267 of 2025. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner/Accused in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in connection with Cr.No.267 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): S.Pavithra For Respondent(s): Ms.R.S.Indira Govt Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 79, 351(2) of BNS r/w 67A of IT Act in Crime No. 267 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17083 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 2. The case of the prosecution is that petitioner is the friend of defacto complainant’s husband. It is alleged that there was a money transaction between petitioner and defacto complainant’s husband. Due to non-payment of money, the petitioner had sent vulgar and highly obscene messages to defacto complainant and her minor daughter through whatsapp. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. He also submits that occurrence took place on 07.11.2025 and defacto complainant is none other than petitioner’s friend’s wife Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there was a money transaction between petitioner and defacto complainant’s husband. Since there was a delay in repaying the money, the petitioner sent obscene messages to defacto complainant. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17083 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, though the allegations made against this petitioner are serious in nature, considering the totality of the circumstances and upon the fact that the occurrence took place on 07.11.2025, this Court is of the firm view that at this length of time, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Ponnamallee, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17083 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 10-07-2026 NR To: 1. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Ponnamallee, 2. The Inspector of Police T5, Vanagaram Police Station, 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17083 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. NR CRL OP No. 17083 of 2026 10-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis