Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49965 (CAL)

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED v. SAREGAMA INDIA LIMITED & ANR.

IP-COM/14/2026 · 2026-10-14

Arindam Mukherjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OIPD-4 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS DIVISION ORIGINAL SIDE IP-COM/14/2026 (OLD NO. CS-COM/93/2024) VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED VS SAREGAMA INDIA LIMITED & ANR. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE Date: 14th October, 2026. APPEARANCE: Mr. Arunabha Deb, Adv. Ms. Ashika Daga, Adv. Ms. Sanchali Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Aditya Mukherjee, Adv. For Plaintiff/Vodafone Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avijit Dey, Adv. For Saregama India Limited Mr. Soumya Ray Chowdhury, Adv. Ms. Samina Khanum, Adv. Mr. Kaustav Misra, Adv. Mr. Naimish Tewari, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kochhar, Adv. For The Indian Performing Right Society Limited THE COURT: The parties have entered into a compromise by signing a terms of settlement on 18th August, 2026. The terms of settlement signed by the authorised officer of the plaintiff and the defendant, duly stamped and punched and counter-signed by the respective advocate-on-records is filed in Court today which is taken on record. The parties have also filed affidavit of competency affirmed by the signatories on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant on 18th August, 2026. On a perusal of the terms of settlement, it appears that the compromise 2 is lawful. The suit being IP-COM/14/2026 (OLD NO.CS-COM/93/2024) is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the terms of settlement. The suit stands, accordingly, disposed of. Any pending interlocutory application in the suit also stands disposed of without further order. The decree be drawn up expeditiously. (ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J.) Sb/