Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4996 (RAJ)

SITARAM S/O NIRBHAY SINGH, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4150/2026 · 2026-03-27

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12931] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4150/2026 Sitaram S/o Nirbhay Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gurda Daang, P.s. Gharibajana, District Bharatpur (Raj) (At Present In District Jail Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.27/2026 registered at Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 189(2), 109(1) and 352 of BNS, 2023 and Section 3/25 Arms Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he fired at the complainant; however, no injury has been attributed to the complainant. This is, therefore, a case involving no injury. Though nine cases have been reported against the present petitioner but he has been acquitted in two of them, and no new case has been registered against him after the year 2020. He argued that six [2026:RJ-JP:12931] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4150/2026] criminal cases have been reported against the co-accused-Jagat Singh who has been enlarged on bail by the trial Court on 24.02.2026 and other co-accusesd-Lokesh and Ravi Singh have also got benefit of bail by the trial Court on 11.02.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 02.02.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sitaram S/o Nirbhay Singh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/75