Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4994 (AP)

B SREERAMULU v. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS

CC/4204/2025 · 2026-07-02

Harinath N

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010692662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4204/2025 Between: 1. B SREERAMULU, S/O. LATE PEDARAMANA, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.N0.7/274-B, BHAGYA NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT-515801 ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF AP, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238. 2. 2. SRI NAYEEM AHAMMED, , S/O. NOT KNOWN, WORKING AS COMMISSIONER, GUNTAKAL MUNICIPALITY, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT-515801. 3 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under contempt of courts Act, for willful disobedience of orders passed by this Honble Court dated 09.09.2025 in W.P. No.23921 of 2025 and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed respondents 5 to 7 as the respondents in this Contempt Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARUPILLI SARADA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.23921 of 2025, dated 09.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.07.2026 PNS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑