Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:864 RSA No. 1346 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1346 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN:
SRI ESHWARAPPA, DEAD BY HIS LRS, SRI OMKARMURTHY G E S/O.LATE. ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.GIRIYAPURA VILLAGE, HIRENALLUR HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 550 …APPELLANT (BY SRI RAMESHA M S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SHIVALINGAMMA, DEAD BY HER LRS,
1. JAGDESHAPPA S/O LATE MALLAPPA AND SHIVALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O.NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, SHIVANI HOBLI AJJAMPURA TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 145.
2. MALLAMMA D/O.LATE. MALLAPPA AND SHIVALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/O.BAGGAVATHI VILLAGE, AJJAMPURA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 145.
3. YOGESHAPPA, S/O.LATE. MALLAPPA
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:864 RSA No. 1346 of 2024
AND SHIVALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O.GOWRAPURA VILLAGE, AJJAMPURA HOBLI, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 547.
4. LALITHA D/O.LATE. MALLAPPA AND SHIVALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.GIRIYAPURA VILLAGE, HIRENALLUR HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 550.
5. RATHNA, D/O LATE MALLAPPA AND SHIVALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.GOWRAPURA VILLAGE, AJJAMPURA HOBLI, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT -577 547
6. DAKSHAYANI, D/O LATE MALLAPPA AND SHIVALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.TYAGADHAKATTE VILLAGE, GULLADAMANE POST, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 549.
7. RASHMI, D/O.LATE. MALLAPPA AND SHIVALINGAMMA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O.BAGGAVATHI VILLAGE, AJJAMPURA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT -577 145.
8. PARVATHAMMA D/O.LATE.CHANNABASAPPA, W/O.HALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/O.GOWRAPURA VILLAGE,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:864 RSA No. 1346 of 2024
AJJAMPURA HOBLI, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT -577 547. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.02.2005 PASSED IN RA NO.34/2002 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN), KADUR., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.04.2001 PASSED IN OS NO.352/1988 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN)., KADUR.TRIAL COURT DISMISSED THE SUIT. APPELLATE COURT ALLOWED THE APPEAL.
THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND FOR SUCH OTHER RELIEFS.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for V time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 127