Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4991 (PAT)

Agarbani Khatoon @ Bhagarbani Khatoon v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./6996/2026 · 2026-02-19

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6996 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2025 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1. Agarbani Khatoon @ Bhagarbani Khatoon Wife of Raish Gaddi Resident of Village- Siswa Saraiya Police station- Bairiya District- West Champaran 2. Raish Gaddi Son of Lalji Gaddi Resident of Village- Siswa Saraiya Police station- Bairiya District- West Champaran 3. Chand Gaddi @ Md. Chand Babu son of Raish Gaddi Resident of Village- Siswa Saraiya Police station- Bairiya District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant and her husband by means of lathi, danda, iron rod and farsa thereby caused injuries to them. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6996 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 2/3 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are Pattidars and due to petty dispute, maar-peet took place between them in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Moreover, doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate- First Class, Bettiah, District- West Champaran in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6996 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 3/3 with Bairiya P.S. Case No. 208 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T