Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010227482025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/328/2026 SHRI BIJOY BHATTACHARAJEE S/O LATE KAMALA KANTA BHATTACHARJEE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SANKAR NAGAR, BBC COLONY, PANDU, HOUSE NO 84, GUWAHATI 12, PO PANDU, PS JALUKBARI, DISTRICT KAMRUP( METRO), ASSAM, PIN 781012 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, 256 A, RAISINA ROAD, RAJ PATH AREA, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI, PIN 110001 2:THE NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAYS REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER MALIGAON GUWAHATI 11 ASSAM PIN 781011 3:THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (WORKS) NF RAILWAYS MALIGAON GUWAHATI 11 ASSAM PIN 781011 4:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM PIN 781006 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (METRO) LICHUBAGAN HENGRABARI GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN 781036 6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER GUWAHATI REVENUE CIRCLE GUWAHATI GUWAHATI-07 ASSAM PIN 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SHARMA, B RONGHANGPI,MR. A K PURKAYASTHA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, REVENUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 25-02-2026 Heard Mr. A.K. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 - 3; Mr. S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the respondent no. 4; and Mr. M. Chetia, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 5 & 6. After making submissions at some length, Mr. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, with a further prayer for liberty to approach again with better particulars to substantiate the legal right, if any, of the petitioner to claim compensation. Page No.# 3/3 The learned counsel for the official respondents have submitted that they have no objection to the submission made for withdrawal of the writ petition, at this stage. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as sought for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant