- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17657 CRL.RP No. 1245 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1245 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MR. MOHAMED AZEEMULLA S/O LATE. MOHAMED AKBAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDENTS OF NO. 230, OLD MASJID MOHALLA, MAGADI TOWN, RAMANGARM, DISTRICT - 562 120, KARNATAKA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMED AZEEMULLA, PARTY IN PERSON) AND: 1. MUNEER AHAMED S/O NOT KNOWN TO COMPLAINANT, AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO. 211, MASJID EXTENSION, 3RD BLOCK, HALEPETAY, KUDUR, MAGADI TALUK - 561 101. 2. JAVEED BANU, W/O MUNNER AHAMED, AGED MAJOR, KARN420034492024 2 PCR NO. 155/2024 RESIDING AT 211, MASJID EXTENSION. 3RD BLOCK, HALEPETAY, KUDUR, MAGADI TALUK - 561 101. 3. RIYAZ @ CHAKNARIYAZ, S/O NOT KNOWN TO COMPLAINANT Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17657 CRL.RP No. 1245 of 2025 AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT NEW MASJID MOHALLA, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 120. 4. NAZEER AHMED, S/O NOT KNOWN TO COMPLAINANT AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT OLD KHILA KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT - 572 130. 5. MUNA, S/O NOT KNOWN TO COMPLAINANT AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT OLD KHILA KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT - 572 130. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO 1. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 13.05.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MAGADI IN PCR. NO.155/2024 AND CONSEQUENTLY, UNDER SECTION 200 OF CR. P. C FOR THE OFFENSES PUNISHABLE BY U/S 441, 323, 324, 506B, 149, 465, 469, 420, 406, 1208, 384, 504, 392, 307, 204, R/W 149 R/W 34 R/W120(B) OF IPC., AND NOW AS PER BNS ACT PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 312, 320, 322, 349, 161, 310, 313, 318, 329, 144, 319, 351, 332, 282, 213 R/W 190 R/W 61 OF BNS ACT., AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 9. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17657 CRL.RP No. 1245 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Despite granting sufficient time, office objections are not complied. Accordingly, revision petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14