Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49895 (KAR)

SMT. REKHA v. SRI SANTOSH KUMAR

CCC/1008/2024 · 2026-01-23

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4281-DB C.C.C. No.1008/2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1008/2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. REKHA W/O SIDDESHWARA B.B. AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 2. SIDDESHWARA B.B. S/O BETUR BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. R/AT NO.810/4, 1ST STAGE 2ND MAIN, 3RD CROSS SHIVAKUMARA SWAMY BADAVANE DAVANAGERE-577002. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA, ADV.,) AND: 1. SRI. SANTOSH KUMAR ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CUM- PRESIDING OFFICER OF THE TRIBUNAL FOR MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF SENIOR CITIZENS AND PARENTS, DAVANAGERE- 577001. Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4281-DB C.C.C. No.1008/2024 2. SRI. RAMAKRISHNA SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE SUB-REGISTRAR DAVANAGERE. 3. SRI. S. BASAARAJAPPA S/O SANNA HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESIDING AT TURCHAGHATTA VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALLUK AND DISTRICT. …ACCUSED 4. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001. …. PROFARMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA K.S. AGA FOR PRO-FORMA R4, A1 & A2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR THE WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.24191/2024 (GM-RES) DATED 31.08.2024 AND PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4281-DB C.C.C. No.1008/2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Learned counsel for the complainants has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the contempt petition. The memo reads as under: "In view of the compliance of the involved in the present contempt petition the contempt petition has been infructuous as such contempt petition withdrawn. It is further submitted that the Complainants praying this Hon'ble court that, may kindly be pleased to permit the Complainants to withdraw the above contempt petition in the interest of justice and equity." 2. In view of the aforesaid memo, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Notice issued to the accused shall stand discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK, List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1