Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4989 (UTT)

AZEEM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/212/2026 · 2026-02-27

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:1452 BA1 No.212 of 2026 Azeem Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J., 1. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Rakesh Negi, Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant-Azeem, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime No.26 of 2026 under Section 8 read with Section 21 of NDPS Act registered at P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar during the pendency of trial before the court below. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has falsely been implicated in the instant case; there was no independent witness; he submits that mandatory provision of NDPS Act has not been complied with in writing; no primafacie offence is made out against the applicant and no FSL report has been received about the alleged recovery. 6. Learned State counsel has not opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant has made out a case for bail. 8. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the Applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 27.02.2026 Arti