Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49876 (MAD)

V.ELUMALAI v. The Commissioner of Land Administration

WP/26595/2026 · 2026-07-10

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 26595 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 26595 of 2026 V.Elumalai ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2. The District collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 3. The District Revenue officer, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 4. The Tahsildar, Vikkiravandi Taluk, Villupuram District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 20.04.2026 in regard to assignment of patta in respect of the Government Tharisu land, as per proceedings of the first respondent in Letter No.138399990/LA(3/2)/2026-1 dated 15.5.2026. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Vaishnavi.R For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26595 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 20.04.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 20.04.2026 before the respondents seeking assignment of land in respect of the Government Tharisu land, as per proceedings of the first respondent in Letter No.138399990/LA(3/2)/2026-1 dated 15.5.2026 and issue patta on his favour. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 20.04.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26595 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 20.04.2026, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any and grant assignment patta in respect of the subject land, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, taking note of the petitioner's claim that he has been utilizing the land for agricultural activities for the past ten years. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 10-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2. The District collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 3. The District Revenue officer, Villupuram District, Villupuram. 4. The Tahsildar, Vikkiravandi Taluk, Villupuram District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26595 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 26595 of 2026 10-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis