Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:836 RSA No. 1768 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1768 OF 2023 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN:
SRI. SEETHARAMAIAH P M S/O LATE MUDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/A PALAGRAHARA VILLAGE, KASABA HOLBI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SRIKANTH PATIL K., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
SMT. GOWRAMMA, D/O LATE ARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/A T.B.EXTENSION, NAGAMANGALA TOWN, MANDYA DISTRICT.
ALSO AT HOUSE BEHIND RURAL POLICE STATION, NAGAMANGALA, NAGAMANGALA TOWN AND TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.06.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.23/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NAGAMANGALA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:836 RSA No. 1768 of 2023
CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.08.2011 PASSED IN OS.NO.44/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NAGAMANGALA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for IV time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 39