Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49824 (CAL)

SAREGAMA INDIA LTD v. VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED

IP-COM/13/2026 · 2026-10-14

Arindam Mukherjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OIPD-3 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS DIVISION ORIGINAL SIDE IP-COM/13/2026 (OLD NO. CS/155/2018) IA NO. GA/2/2018 (OLD NO. GA/2187/2018) SAREGAMA INDIA LTD. VS VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE Date: 14th October, 2026. APPEARANCE: Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Avijit Dey, Adv. For Saregama India Ltd. Mr. Arunabha Deb, Adv. Ms. Ashika Daga, Adv. Ms. Sanchali Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Aditya Mukherjee, Adv. For Defendant/Vodafone Mr. Soumya Ray Chowdhury, Adv. Ms. Samina Khanum, Adv. Mr. Kaustav Misra, Adv. Mr. Naimish Tewari, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kochhar, Adv. For The Indian Performing Right Society Limited THE COURT: It is submitted by the plaintiff that the plaintiff does not intend to proceed with the suit any further. The intention expressed by the plaintiff is unconditional. The learned advocate representing the plaintiff has received a written instruction in this regard from the plaintiff which is placed before the Court and is kept with the records. 2 The suit being IP-COM/13/2026 (OLD NO.CS/155/2018) stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Since the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution, any pending application in the suit also stands disposed of without any further order. (ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J.) Sb/