Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49822 (KAR)

HANUMANTHARAYAPPA v. RAMAPPA

RSA/1787/2023 · 2026-01-09

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1482 RSA No. 1787 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1787 OF 2023 (SP) BETWEEN: HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT KOTAGUDDA VILLAGE, NIDAGAL HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK - 561 202, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. …APPELLANT [BY SRI MANIVANNAN G., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: RAMAPPA S/O BADAKADARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT KOTAGUDDA VILLAGE, NIDAGAL HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK - 561 202, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.06.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.29/2019 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PAVAGADA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND DISMISSING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2018 PASSED IN OS NO.326/2013 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PAVAGADA. Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1482 RSA No. 1787 of 2023 THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for VI time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 84