Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4971 WP No. 54691 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 54691 OF 2018 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
1. SHRI K NARASIMHA HEGDE S/O LATE K RAMA HEGDE AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT HEGDE PLASTIC CENTRE, MAIN ROAD, PUTTUR D.K.DISTRICT -574 201
2. SRI MANJUNATHA HEGDE S/O LATE K RAMA HEGDE AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT HEGDE PLASTIC CENTRE MAIN ROAD, PUTTUR D.K.DISTRICT -574 201 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1. CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL PUTTUR, D K DISTRICT REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER-574 201
2. SMT PRAPHULLA D/O LATE YUVARAJA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT VASANTHA VIHAR NEAR JAIN BASADI MAIN ROAD, PUTUR, PUTTUR KASABA VILLAGE PUTTUR TALUK D K DISTRICT - 574 201
SINCE DECEASED BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4971 WP No. 54691 of 2018
2.(a) REKHA KUMARI D/O.LATE PRAFULLA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT ARUVA, ALADAANGADY VILLAGE BELTHANGADY TALUK D.K.DISTRICT - 5742 17
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A KESHAVA BHAT ., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI.B.S.SACHIN., ADVOCATE FOR R-2 (a))
THIS W.P. IS FILED UDNER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 01.12.2018 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER, CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, PUTTUT, D.K. VIDE ANNX-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
(i) Writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 01-12-2018 in KRA SAM. AAVI/CR/85/2018- 19 passed by the Commissioner, City Municipal Council, Puttur, D.K original copy of which is produced at Annexure A.
(ii) Any other writ or directions to meet the ends of justice. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4971 WP No. 54691 of 2018
2. A memo dated 29.01.2026 signed by learned counsel for petitioners has been filed, which reads as under:
"It is submitted that the impugned order in the writ petition is suspending the trade licence issued in favour of the petitioners for the year 2017-18 and now the respondent no.1 has issued a fresh licence for the year 2025-26 by considering the eligibility of the petitioners.
Copy of the Trade Licence issued for the year 2025-26 is produced alongwith the memo. Hence, above writ petition does not survive for consideration. Wherefore, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the above writ petition by noticing the subsequent event in the interest of justice and equity."
3. Accepting the said memo and submission of counsel for petitioners, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Pending I.As., if any stand disposed of. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GSS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29