[2026:RJ-JP:11062] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2738/2026 Rajkesh Meena Son Of Shri Ghanshyam Meena, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 11, Jakhoda, Post Jakhoda, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli ----Petitioner Versus Axis Bank Limited, Karauli, Branch Karauli, Through Its Branch Manager. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhan Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ratnesh Sharma through V.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 16/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the bank account of the petitioner was frozen not only on account of the complaint received from the Cyber Crime Authorities, but also on account of the non-matching of the petitioner’s profile and lack of information submitted by the petitioner to the respondent – Bank. Thus, considering the unusual and suspected transactions, the bank account of the petitioner was frozen. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent Bank may continue to put a hold on the disputed amount of Rs.2,500/- in pursuance to the complaint received from the Cyber Crime Department and he may be further granted liberty to submit the requisite details and documents as required by the respondent-Bank for verification of his bank details. 3. Taking note of the above, the respondent-Bank is directed to continue the hold on the amount of Rs.2,500/- credited in the [2026:RJ-JP:11062] (2 of 2) [CW-2738/2026] bank account of the petitioner. Also, the petitioner shall submit the requisite details and documents with the respondent - Bank within a period of 15 days from today, i.e. 16.03.2026 and the bank shall take a concrete decision with respect to de-freezing of the bank account of the petitioner on the basis of the said details and documents, positively within a period of 15 days thereafter. 4. It is made clear that the petitioner will co-operate with the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies and will appear before them as and when required. It is also ordered that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue the bank account till the Investigating Agencies and Bank Authorities permit the petitioner to do so. 5. It is further ordered that after investigation, if the involvement of the petitioner is found in any illegal transaction, the petitioner shall be liable to pay amount involved in the aforesaid illegal transaction and will face inquiry/investigation as per law. 6. Needless to say, that this order has been passed only to process the requisite details and documents submitted by the petitioner with the respondent - Bank in the context of de-freezing of the bank account of the petitioner and in no manner is to be construed as any determination with respect to the merits of the financial cyber fraud complaint under question. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J VINAY MEENA /39