- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:455 MFA No. 6300 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6300 OF 2016 (MV-I) BETWEEN: 1. SMT MANJULA W/O LATE M. K. DHANANJAIAH @ APPANNI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 2. KUM. HEMALATHA D/O LATE M K DHANANJAIAH @ APPANNI, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, 3. MAST. BHARATHKUMAR M. D. S/O LATE M. K. DHANANJAIAH @ APPANNI, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, SINCE APPELLANTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1 SMT. MANJULA AS NATURAL GUARDIAN ALL ARE R/AT MALLIGEVALU, KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT PRESENTLY AT C/O C.S.RAJAPPA, D.NO. 84, HOUSING BOARD, HOLENARASIPURA TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KAVITHA H.C., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:455 MFA No. 6300 of 2016 AND: 1. LOKESH S/O EARAIAH, NO. 03, HOSAPURA VILLAGE, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 201. 2. THE MANAGER ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., S.S.COMPLEX, SUBHASH CHOWK, HASSAN - 573 201. …RESPONDENTS (R1 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED BY SRI. ASHOK N. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22/02/2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.656/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., HOLENARASIPUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellant. Counsel for respondent is present. 2. On 27.11.2025, the following order was passed by this Court:- - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:455 MFA No. 6300 of 2016 "None appears on behalf of the appellants, though the matter was called twice, one in the morning session and second at post lunch session. However, in the interest of justice, office is directed to re-list this matter on 12.12.2025. If none appears on the next date of hearing, it is for the roaster Bench to pass appropriate orders considering the absence." 3. Today also none appears for the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE LDC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24