ALTAP SAYYAD PATHAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
BA/1504/2026 · 2026-08-25
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4979 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4979 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 BA.1504-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1504 OF 2026 ALTAP SAYYAD PATHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. N. S. Ghanekar. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. D. Ghayal … CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : August 25, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the Applicant on instructions submits that the Lower Court has rejected the application before filing of the charge-sheet. However, during the interregnum period, the charge-sheet was filed and the bail application presently does have a copy of the charge-sheet along with it but Applicant would withdraw the application and filed a fresh application along with charge-sheet before the learned Trial Court.
3. The learned Advocate for the Applicant thus prays for withdrawal of the application with liberty to approach the 2026:BHC-AUG:38735
2 BA.1504-26.odt learned Trial Court afresh. Liberty is granted as prayed. If the Applicant prefers a fresh application along with charge-sheet before the Trial Court, the said application be decided on its own merits.
4. Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) ... vmk/-