- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4443 RSA No. 1234 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1234 OF 2025 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. (A) SRI SIDDEGOWDA SINCE DECEASED, BY L.RS. SMT. JAVANAMMA, W/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, (B) SMT. KALARMMA, D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, (C) SMT. SHIVAMMA, D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, APPELLANTS 1(A) TO (C) ARE R/AT SALUNDI VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI - 570 008, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT. (D) SMT. NINGAMMA, D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, W/O BOGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT MAHADEVAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI - 571 415, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT. (E) SMT. BASAMMA, D/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4443 RSA No. 1234 of 2025 W/O MARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT SIDDALINGAPURA VILLAGE, K ASABA HOBLI - 570 003, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SURESHA M., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI C MANOHARA S/O LATE DEVAIAH @ CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.2445, 5TH CROSS, HOSABEEDI, K.G. KOPPAL, MYSURU 570 009. 2. (A) SRI C. NAGEGOWDA, SINCE DECEASED, BY L.RS. SMT. SHIVAMMA, W/O LATE NAGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, (B) SRI B. MANJU, S/O LATE NAGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, (C) SRI BASAVARAJU, S/O LATE NAGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, (D) SRI SHIVA S/O LATE NAGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.2(A) TO (D) ARE R/AT SALUNDI VILLAGE, JAYAPURA HOBLI - 570 008, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4443 RSA No. 1234 of 2025 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.03.2025, PASSED IN R.A.NO.110/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL PRL. DISTRICT AND SPECIAL JUDGE, MYSURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.12.2019 PASSED IN OS.NO.258/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL II CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU, AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 24