Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4977 (GUJ)

KANTIBHAI @ BHURIYO RATILAL PANCHAL v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.MA/954/2026 · 2026-01-16

S V Pinto

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 954 of 2026 In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL/1425/2026 ========================================================== KANTIBHAI @ BHURIYO RATILAL PANCHAL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR. JARJEESKHAN(7235) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. PRANAV DHAGAT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO Date : 16/01/2026 ORAL ORDER RULE. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appears and waives service of rule for and on behalf of the respondent-State. Heard learned advocate Mr. Jarjeeskhan appearing online for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Pranav Dhagat for the respondent No. 1 – State. This application has been filed by the present applicant seeking condonation of delay of 24 days, which had occurred in preferring F/Criminal Appeal No.1425 of 2026. Having heard learned advocates appearing for the parties, and having gone through the averments made in this application as well as those made out before this Court, delay of 24 days, which had occurred in preferring F/Criminal Appeal No. 1425 of 2026 p. 2 appears to have been sufficiently explained. Accordingly, the delay of 24 days deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the present application stands allowed and disposed of. The delay of 24 days, which had occurred in preferring F/Criminal Appeal No. 1425 of 2026 is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute. (S. V. PINTO,J) VISHAL MISHRA