Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4977 (AP)

PETA TIRUPAL REDDY, NELLORE & 5 OTRS., v. PETA KRISHNA REDDY, NELLORE & 2 OTRS, REP PP.,

CRLRC/564/2015 · 2026-07-08

Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : - Date of pronouncement : 09.07.2026 Date of uploading : 13.07.2026 APHC010459522015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] THURSDAY, THE 9th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 564/2015 Between: 1. PETA TIRUPAL REDDY, NELLORE & 5 OTRS.,, S/O. PULLA REDDY, AGED'ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. R.K.NAGAR, NAWABPET, NELLORE. 2. PETA PADRNAVATHI, W/O. THIRUPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, NAWABPET, NELLORE. 3. CHEEMALA VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O. NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, . R/O. GUNDEMADAKALA VILLAGE OF VINJAMUR MANDAL. 4. CHEEMALA RATHNAKAR REDDY, S/O. NARASIMHA REDDY, 38 YEARS, R/O. R.K.NAG4, NAWABPET, NELLORE. 5. CHEEMALA VARA LAKSHMI, W/O. RATHNAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. R.K. NAGAR, NAWABPET, NELLORE. 6. MANAGANELLORE VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O. SANKARAIAH, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. R.K.NAGAR, NAWABPET, NELLORE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PETA KRISHNA REDDY NELLORE 2 OTRS REP PP, S/O. ESWAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCT: PVT. SERVICE, R/O. H.NO.4-1-194, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, NWABPET, NELLORE CITY. 2. THE STATE OF A P, THROUGH SHO, II TOWN P.S.,NELLORE, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. 3. PETA ESWAR REDDY, S/O. PULLA REDDY R/O. R.K.NAGAR, NAWABPET, NELLORE, (R3 IS NOT NECESSARY) ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.564 OF 2015 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed challenging the orders dated 08.01.2015 passed by the learned II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nellore in Crl.M.P. No.7 of 2015 in C.F. No.7749 of 2014. 2. Sri K.Naga Pahnindra, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the revision petitioners submitted that this matter has became infructuous in view of the disposal of main case. 3. Recorded the said submission, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 09.07.2026 knl Whether the order is : ✓ Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No ✓ Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No