Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49769 (MAD)

SRI KRISHNA DEPARTMENTAL STORES (33ACIFS5290A1ZB) v. THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER 1

WP/25470/2026 · 2026-07-15

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 25470 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 25470 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.27764 & 27769 of 2026 M/s.Sri Krishna Departmental Stores (33ACIFS5290A1ZB) Rep. by its partner S.Maniraja, 1/119, Meenkarai Main road, Subbe Goundepudur, Sungam, Pollachi 642103 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 Pollachi West Assessment circle, CT Building, Palghat Road, Pollachi 642 001 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the impugned order on the file of the Respondent vide GSTIN 33ACIFS5290A1ZB/2021-22 dated 30.12.2025 (DRC 07 Reference No. ZD331225444320X) and quash the same which was uploaded only in the GST Portal after cancellation of the Registration of the Petitioner and further direct the Respondent to pass assessment order afresh after providing opportunity of Personal Hearing. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25470 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.J Madhusuthanan For Respondent(s): Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Counsel (Tax) ******* ORDER An order dated 30.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25470 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 15-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To The Deputy State Tax Officer 1 Pollachi West Assessment circle, CT Building, Palghat Road, Pollachi 642 001 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25470 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 25470 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.27764 & 27769 of 2026 15-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis