Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49769 (CAL)

SK. AJID AND ANR. v. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/22700/2026 · 2026-10-09

Uday Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

168 09.10.2026 Ct. No. 42 Sandip WPA 22700 of 2026 Sk. Ajid & Anr. Vs. The Election Commission of India & Ors. Mr. Saidur Rahaman … for the petitioners Ms. Anamika Pandey … for E.C.I. Mr. Banshi Badan Maity …for the State. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners having WZI 1937408 and CMF 2270908 have preferred an appeal against deletion of their name in the SIR process before the designated Appellate Tribunal. 2. The petitioners pray for expeditious disposal of the said appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the Election Commission of India submits that huge number of appeals pending before the learned Appellate Tribunal, are being disposed of on a day-to-day basis. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 6. WPA 22700 of 2026 is disposed of. 7. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (UDAY KUMAR, J.)